![]() This accidental discovery confused me, and the result above make me suspect the theory, Putting IE/Chrome or System cache into other medium/driver saving your SSD's wear. In fact, this written data traffic produced by explorer's cache in HDD is calculated into the SSD's total NAND writes.Īctually I'm not care of the SSD's wear, and I'm sure it couldn't reach the limited lifespan with normal usage until next generation product arrives. Also I have got the same result with the newly Intel SSD Toolbox, AIDA64 3.20 and CrystalDiskInfo 6.0.1. Finally, each test(using one kind of explorer) improved less than 200Mb in Total Host Writes which is normal for system operating, but this process also consumed about 3Gb SSD's Total NAND writes in total in the CrystalDiskInfo 6.0.1. ![]() When I cached several Movies embedded in any explorer without other operation separately, there are lots of written data traffic produced in the HDD partition, and just little data wrote in system disk(SSD), it’s no doubt. With the explorer working, the written data stream from cache is produced in the HDD partition theoretically, also I have got this conclusion through the System's Resource Monitor and the Diskmon from Microsoft website. ![]() I have moved the cache of IE, chrome and Firefox to the Hard Drive using IE setting or mklink command, and verified it correctly. The SSD with the OS is the first(primary) Disk, and the HDD is the second one. When I paid attention to the NAND writes, something make me confused. It worked well with the OS Win8.1 Pro 圆4. I bought an Intel SSD 530 120G for my laptop several days ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |